<rss version="0.91"><channel>
<title>Patent rankings:  The numbers game v. patent quality</title>
<link>http://www.rethinkip.com/archives/patent_rankings_the_numbers_game_v_patent_quality.html</link>
<description>Every year,&nbsp;several&nbsp;lists are published that&nbsp;purport&nbsp;to&nbsp;rank various types of organizations on some type of innovation scale.&nbsp; The lists provide great headline material (&ldquo;Top ten universities announced;&rdquo; &ldquo;Most innovative companies named,&rdquo; etc.), but not much else.&nbsp; It seems there&rsquo;s a list for...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Numbers vs. quality</title>
<link>http://www.patentchronicles.com/archives/20050420/numbers-vs-quality/</link>
<description>Excellent post over at rethink(ip).  They make the extremely valid point that having a lot of patents does not mean you have quality patents.  For the analysis that I do, I try to go at least one layer below the raw numbers (e.g., best companies at get...</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>